Post by account_disabled on Dec 4, 2023 8:56:45 GMT
May not like it I indicated why this is so a bit above in short lack of clarity of regulations guidelines And as it ultimately turned out it did not respond so strongly that a complaint was filed against us to the Personal Data Protection Office Despite very detailed explanations on our part the Office had a different opinion on this matter in our opinion at least not in line with the realities of the practical approach to problem We received an order to delete the IP address and the artificially assigned cookie ID which we were unable to associate with the person who submitted.
The complaint to the and to inform other Phone Number List entities to which this information was shared about the need to delete this data It is worth mentioning that the evidence we presented contained specific information that for iSecure the IP address and cookie ID referred to above do not in any way enable the identification of the complainant that the entity indicated by the complainant as the entity that could obtain but ultimately did not obtain access to the complainant s IP address he is our processor and we cooperate with him on the basis of an.
Entrustment agreement etc We could have simply left this case because in the end we received only a warning from the Office of Personal Data Protection not a financial penalty But that s not what this is all about is it Today we had this problem tomorrow anyone who has a company website may have it In this situation the management board of iSecure decided that this inaccurate examination of the matter and the decision by the Personal Data Protection Office on matters referred to in the provisions of the telecommunications law is the Personal Data Protection Office really competent.
The complaint to the and to inform other Phone Number List entities to which this information was shared about the need to delete this data It is worth mentioning that the evidence we presented contained specific information that for iSecure the IP address and cookie ID referred to above do not in any way enable the identification of the complainant that the entity indicated by the complainant as the entity that could obtain but ultimately did not obtain access to the complainant s IP address he is our processor and we cooperate with him on the basis of an.
Entrustment agreement etc We could have simply left this case because in the end we received only a warning from the Office of Personal Data Protection not a financial penalty But that s not what this is all about is it Today we had this problem tomorrow anyone who has a company website may have it In this situation the management board of iSecure decided that this inaccurate examination of the matter and the decision by the Personal Data Protection Office on matters referred to in the provisions of the telecommunications law is the Personal Data Protection Office really competent.